Jump to content

User talk:JuniperChill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Administrators' newsletter – September 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

Administrator changes

removed Pppery

Interface administrator changes

removed Pppery

Oversighter changes

removed Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
  • A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A86 autoroute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A13.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anastasia Kingsnorth (September 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 13:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Midland Main Line upgrade

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Midland Main Line upgrade at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Flibirigit (talk) 01:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jubilee Bridge (Tay)

[edit]

On 19 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jubilee Bridge (Tay), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the course of the River Tay was diverted to allow the construction of the Jubilee Bridge? You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jubilee Bridge (Tay)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A9 road (Scotland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A96.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Midland Main Line upgrade

[edit]

On 23 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Midland Main Line upgrade, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although the electrification of the Midland Main Line was designated as a high priority in 1981, work to electrify the northern part of the line did not begin until more than 30 years later? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Midland Main Line upgrade. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Midland Main Line upgrade), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded
removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Oxford zero emission zone

[edit]

On 4 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oxford zero emission zone, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Oxford is the first city in the United Kingdom to adopt a zero emission zone? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zero-emission zone in Oxford. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Oxford zero emission zone), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYKs

[edit]

Re your comment about "drive-by nominations". As far as I'm concerned, it doesn't matter who started the article, or who nominated it. A drive-by can encourage a newer editor to write more articles. It encouraged me when I first started editing some 20 years ago. So, if you spot a new article with an interesting fact about it, feel free to nominate it at DYK. Mjroots (talk) 06:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries @Mjroots:. In fact, my first DYK nom was truly a drive-by nomination which I nominated just in-time: Cozy game (nom page) as I never edited the article other than (just now) to add to the cozy games category. I consider Jubilee Bridge (Tay) to be semi-drive-by since I improved it after nomination. The Midland Main Line upgrade was mostly edited by another user, then I proved that to GA and got that onto DYK. I sometimes considered a drive-by nom, but I often forget about it unless I created/improved it myself. My guess is that only 10% of created articles get nominated by DYK. My guess is that not many people know about DYK. JuniperChill (talk) 09:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let me also add that I created and nominated Tiny Glade (nom) just before the 2024 rail crash in Wales. JuniperChill (talk) 10:48, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And the Tiny Glade article is getting a lot of views, almost 1000 yesterday, way more than I expected. I bet the DYK will get over 500 views per hour. JuniperChill (talk) 13:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Maxim

Oversighter changes

removed Maxim

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling error

[edit]

I don't think there is a problem with correcting a spelling error even in a closed discussion per WP:REDACT as all it does is correct a spelling and the only way the meaning may be considered to have been changed is as a result of the error. I don't wish to have spelling errors in my posts and given that I later discovered it I don't think there is a problem with simply correcting it. I'm aware that correcting spelling errors etc in other people's comments is generally frowned upon, see Template:Uw-tpv1 but I don't think that applies with you're own posts even if archived, thanks. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out you've been doing it to others as well and none of the others have been reverted. I think this is a fine example of WP:IAR which I forgot about, and possibly also WP:NOTBURO. You are welcome to revert what I did to your comment at Talk:Newhaven. I would never edit others comments except under WP:TPO. There's even a discussion going on about this too about applying WP:TPO on archived discussions JuniperChill (talk) 23:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I don't really think there is a problem correcting typos even in archived discussions on you're own posts. As far as other people's typos go I don't do this except in cases like this where the typo would cause confusion in a discussion and if I do I always make sure I ping the user. I do occasionally remove double signs or additional headers from move discussions but otherwise per TOP I don't generally edit other people's posts. That said if I saw someone correcting typos in other people's posts I wouldn't revert or ask them not to unless the person who posted the comments complained about it. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:47, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cambrian Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Llanbadarn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello JuniperChill! The thread you created at the Teahouse, How to cite in this format?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:06, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2024 Talerddig train collision

[edit]

On 23 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2024 Talerddig train collision, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2024 Talerddig train collision was the first collision between passenger trains in Wales since 1991? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2024 Talerddig train collision. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2024 Talerddig train collision), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Idk why the bot didn't add this to my talk page for some reason, so this was manually added by me. Same can be said for the talk page, which I also had to add manually. JuniperChill (talk) 20:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Vehicle insurance in the United States

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Vehicle insurance in the United States, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Coffee Talk has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Coffee Talk has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 05:20, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Tiny Glade

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Tiny Glade at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 03:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

added
readded Pppery

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello JuniperChill! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Significant coverage definition?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tiny Glade

[edit]

On 8 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tiny Glade, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tiny Glade was developed by a two-person studio and was the fourth most-played demo on 2024's Steam Next Fest? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tiny Glade. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tiny Glade), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

1=Launchballer 00:03, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Emmerdale characters (2025)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, JuniperChill. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Emmerdale characters (2025), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page mover granted

[edit]

Hello, JuniperChill. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! SilverLocust 💬 18:50, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want that page accepted!

[edit]

I just want to publish one article! Renebird100 (talk) 07:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, at what date could I publish this page? Renebird100 (talk) 07:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
See my and other reviewer's comments at Draft:45th Golden Raspberry Awards. JuniperChill (talk) 07:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, the nominees are going to be announced in a few days. So if the first week of January is over for the Razzies prenomination ballot, you can request deletion on the drafts. Renebird100 (talk) 00:58, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raegan Revord (2nd nomination)

[edit]

Hello, JuniperChill,

I was just writing a closure statement for this AFD when you went ahead and closed this discussion. FYI, I don't think this AFD discussion was an appropriate one for an NAC closure but I'm not going to revert your action. We'll see if it is contested at DRV. Liz Read! Talk! 04:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While the result is not one I support (I put forth "weak delete"), I am much more troubled by the logic used in the closure. To quote one line from it: "I would say that judging by the votes below, she just about passes the notability criteria." This has two major problems: arguments are not supposed to be considered "votes", and by saying it just about passes, that means that the subject doesn't really pass the criteria. Since a deletion discussion is supposed to be showing how policy and guidelines apply, this finding is inconsistent with a keep. The closing also creates its own arguments of concern over the article, having to do with the subject's age. The bulk of it seems less like a closure statement and more like a "delete" argument that should've been placed during the discussion. I am not sure that my concerns meet what is asked for at WP:DRV, but I do ask that JuniperChill consider revoking the closure and allowing an admin to address the matter. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 06:30, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have now raised the closure at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2025_January_3#3_January_2025. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 16:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raegan Revord (2nd nomination)

[edit]

Hi JuniperChill,

I just relisted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raegan Revord (2nd nomination) as an uninvolved administrator in my individual capacity per WP:NACD, after reading concerns raised about it at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2025_January_3#Raegan_Revord. Regards, Owen× ☎ 16:23, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A9 dualling project

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A9 dualling project you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BigChrisKenney -- BigChrisKenney (talk) 08:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JuniperChill&oldid=1267706998"